Email 
Studio Conductors
Semester
Subject
Student Name
Ameya Thanawala, Krishna Khurusane, Manasa Ravikumar, Vaishnavi Gurnalkar, Pranali Thool
Architectural Theory
IV
Ar. Neha Panchal, Ar. Yagnik Bhatija

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

The critical analysis of the manifesto of Futurist Architecture, made us realize architecture is not just about the present, It is about past, present and future as well as the people and their diverse needs.
What Antonio wished to bring about as well as the needs of Marinetti were very Youth centred. What they didn’t realize is that multiple Generations exist at the given time frame. If architecture evolves with the needs of the people, then all the generations should be considered. We Believe that “ One must Design for the Present, Acknowledging the Past and Being Responsible for the Future”.
Also, Architecture needs to have a connection with the people and not just merely exist. They can be living creatures. Dynamism can not only be achieved through form but also by the way the building is interacting with the people at multiple levels. Every individual develops an emotional bond with a building and hence the buildings should also respond in that way. This led us developing the manifesto of Supplementary futurism which talks about “Supplements' ' which can enhance the existing built and unbuilt spaces and can be of a better value to the society.

Manifesto of Supplementary Futurism

  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • issuu icon
  • AOA grey
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • issuu icon
  • AOA grey